American style authoritarianism

concerning the way of America in expanding the liberalism, democracy and free trade idea, there are some weird phenomenon arise when we deeply look at the current reality. just recall first that the purpose of that idea was to ensure the basic right of every people either in term of politics, economy, social and culture. well, the ongoing condition is likely to be in contrary. the policy they decide is more focus on their interest, instead uphold the core issue related to human right. just imagine, is it possible to provide people freedom in any sector and any country when they, in same time, try to place the military agent in every strategic area, which is actually it is part of other countries territory? yes, they just ensure their interest merely, even for that purpose, they had ignored other country's sovereignty. so what is the different between US idea with communism that use the power of country to treat the freedom of individual. actually, they just replace authoritarianism from inside one country to be applied to the world at whole. let see the future of this ideology.....

benarkahku sebegitunya?

kujejaki tanah ini sepanjang hari
ku tahu kadang becek, gersang bahkan berdebu menyesakkan
aku selalu disitu...
tetap disitu..
menjejakinya sejauh waktuku...

aku tidak pernah melayang
aku tau setiap tetanggaku juga tetap disitu
mengarungi hidupnya tanpa kesah
mensyukuri keringatnya dengan senyum cerah

aku tau mereka juga tidak pernah melayang
mereka disana dengan tenang
selalu tenang...
bahkan disaat nasinya adalah pakan ternakku

aku tau aku tidak akan bisa terbang
lalu buat apa merasa hidup bersama awan?
merasa...
menghirupi oksigen kualitas terbaik
mengakrabi bintang dan mencandakan merpati

seharusnya..
kuingat kakiku lebih dari apa yang diotakku
karena kakiku selalu ada disitu
tidak akan pernah kemana-mana
tetap menjejak...
menapak pada tanah yang sama
dengan yang lainnya

Innocent Keynesian

On which level should government involve in economy? This is ongoing debate that could not been concluded yet. But, for me, at least there is one point that should not be doubt “government must be remain exist in economy in order to protect the interest of unlucky citizens who unfortunately often as the majority”. Smith may argued that they will be protected by “invisible hand”, which some said that it was representation of God in regulating the globe. He might forget that God "needs" the effort of the people to change unlucky destiny currently they run. Latest world economic condition shows that the market is getting far away from perfect competition, which is the market condition that ensures equal allocation of the resources for all actors. The market leader abuses their market power in order to grape more profit without giving attention to uncontrollable of hunger and unemployment. The power of money controls economy as whole and letting real sectors being stagnant. On these situations, government should play their role. The problem is how should government play their role in economy? The simple answer is being innocent. Government as organization, institution or person should act like kasim (just remember about the ancient history of China) or slave in serving people interest. They should free from particular group or their selves interest. The story telling about fault involvement of government in economy is often because of the lack concern of them to avoid egoistic interest. They should remember that they are paid by citizens so the interest of all citizens should be the priority. The next question arise, does not the policy formulated by government is kind of political mechanism where various interest allowed to compete in? Hereby, we have to differentiate between government as political institution and as tool of applying policy or commonly called bureaucracy. As political institution, government may open to take any interest or intervention. But this mechanism just allowed until the process of constructing grand policy including budget to support it. In implementation process of the grand policy, the kind of government who responsible is it as institution what so called bureaucracy. Thus, what I mention that government should free from any interest is in term of government as bureaucracy. In my opinion, even though political mechanism is known as the dirty process, but the policy resulted by it is never constructed by intention to damaging society or destructing people. The problem often arises is in the implementation of it. One that causes is related whit managing the interest influencing the bureaucracy. Thus, for civil servant in particular, just being innocent Keynesian. Seorang Keynesian yang lugu……

Does KPK overact?

some are shocked by the backthrough policy launched by KPK in regard with the obilgation for the accused person to wear special uniform. in addition, KPK has prepared to involve in budget meeting of DPR. how should we response to those policies? hereby, i will just focus on the policy of involving in budget meeting. in regard with imposing special uniform for accused person, i definitely agree with them. corruption is special crime that potentially create massive damage in societey so the special treatment must be applied to the actors. as a notice the uniform has to remains respect to the human right and not violate the "pra duga tak bersalah" principles. for instance by appearing the label of uniform in accordace with the status of the accused persons.
how about the idea of KPK to involve in budget meeting? my position regarding to this idea is tend to be disagree. in principle, KPK tries to prevent the corruption since the very beginning stage of constructing the government budget. it is ok since KPK could ensure that monitoring system including the staff that they build is highly protected from the possibility of bribering and contaminate from external bad influence that could treat integrity of KPK itself. if KPK highly involve in the unclear systeam like ordinary governemnt system, it will potentially treat the clearence of KPK as institution that until now can be grade great. the best choice in my oppinion is keep stay outside of the system and work maximally when they found the violation of the regulation on the system. the basic principle should be awared by KPK is just like the principle on the soccer game that "the refree does not be permitted to involve in exercise section of particular club". because when refree too close to the player, coach and management, it will potentially create what so called conflict of interest. Thus, keep stay away outside the system is the best choice of KPK if they want not loose their reputation. hopefully KPK can formulate the best decision...

Mempertanyakan Kebenaran?

ada logika menarik tentang kebenaran "jangan biarkan kebenaran jatuh kebumi karena akan membuatnya menjelma menjadi kekuasaan yang represif. biarkanlah kebenaran tetap menjadi mistery dan harapan. yang terpenting saat ini adalah kebaikan sekarang". pemikir tersebut mengibaratkan kebaikan sebagai kosakata present tenses sedangkan kebenaran adalah future tenses. lalu dalam konteks apa pemikir tadi membicarakannya? beliau mencoba mendebat kebenaran samawi yang dituangkan lewat kitab suci. tentunya kalimat dalam tanda petik diatas merupakan kritik keras terhadap upaya implementasi "aturan agama" menjadi hukum positive.
apa yang bisa kita tangkap dan kita kritisi dari statement pemikir diatas? luar biasa sekali logika beliau sehingga mampu mendikotomikan kata kebaikan dan kebenaran sehingga menjadi begitu kontradiktif. konsep kebaikan sebagai yang terpenting adalah sebuah konsep yang meminggirkan iman dalam cara berfikir. salah satu "karakter iman" adalah iman terhadap sesuatu hal yang gaib. adanya hari pertanggung jawaban adalah sesuatu yang gaib dan karena kita telah dikabarkannya lewat kitab suci maka kita mengimaninya. memang benar kebenaran ini ada kelak di depan hari untuk pembuktiannya. tetapi konsekuensi dari mengimani kebnaran ini harus diimplemntasikan sekarang. karena kita yakin bahwa setiap apa yg kita lakukan sekarang akan dimintai pertanggungjawaban kelak dikemudian hari maka kita akan hati2 dalam bertindak dan berupaya agar setiap gerak searah dengan ketentuan yang memintakan pertanggung jawaban (yang notabene adalah zat yang mengabarkan tentang kebenaran hari pertanggung jawaban). dari logika ini kita tau bahwa kebaikan sekarang bukanlah satu2nya unsur pengontrol gerak kita. iman akan kebenaran yang memang masih mistery atau ghaib juga seharusnya punya peran bahkan mungkin lebih besar untuk mengontrol langkah kita. dengan iman itu bahkan kita tahu bahwa "apa yang menurut kita baik sekarang belum tentu baik untuk masa depan". jadi menjadikan kebaikan sekarang sebagai yang terpenting adalah suatu sikap arogansi dari manusia yang serba terbatas. kecuali kalo iman pribadi kita mengatakan bahwa kita akan hidup selamanya. thing that absolutely impossible.....

Revolution in Oil Industry (3)

Further problem that should be anticipated after the implementation of “pro competition regulation” in oil industry is mostly related with volatility of oil price and distribution of the oil. As we know that oil is a very sensitive good. The increasing of fuel potentially can create instability. Nevertheless, the explanation will be different if we relate or compare the effect of increasing fuel price with increasing price of other basic need such as food. Particularly for low or middle income people, the consumption share of fuel is absolutely lower than food. Therefore, the subsidy for all kind of fuel is actually only being beneficial for rich people. It may be true that the increasing price of fuel will affect to increasing price of other good. But, some research shows that the effect is actually lower than direct effect when the price of food increases. That’s why, it is better for people if government gives more subsidy to food sector than oil sector. Regarding to the current policy of oil subsidy, in my opinion government has set the correct policy by giving subsidy only for “low level of fuel”. It will be beneficial for low income people and prevent the absorption of subsidy by rich people. However, this kind of argument actually has not spread out to all people yet. The government should continue to giving explanation to people in order to reduce the shock affected by volatility of fuel price.
Related with the distribution of fuel, the emergence of Law No 22/2001 may make the distribution system of fuel will be more complicated. Now the distribution of fuel is not fully under control and responsibility of Pertamina. Each involved company has own distribution system to sell its product. It will become challenges for government to ensure the availability of fuel in every region of Indonesia. The possibility of scarcity of fuel will rise during competition period. Facing this problem, actually government already has institution that deal with managing the distribution of fuel. BPH Migas is the institution that deals with the problem. Thus, In order to ensure the availability of fuel in every region, government should strengthen the role of BPH Migas.
Based on all explanation above, we can conclude that deregulation of oil industry in Indonesia is on the right track. Current regulation has given benefit for consumer, Pertamina as national oil company and domestic economy in general. The law also has prepared all institution to solve various problems that potentially happen. So the urgent action that should be done by government in dealing with oil industry is strengthening those institutions and keeps supervising the implementation of the law.

finish

Revolution in Oil Industry (2)

The situation has already been changed, since the emergence of Law number 22 of 2001, Domestic oil industry has not being monopolized by Pertamina. Now Peratmina is just as own state company, which is operated in oil industry. The regulation function in oil industry has given back to the government, where here is represented by Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. Other essence of this law is the opportunity of other player either domestic or foreign to involve in oil industry in both upstream and downstream market. It means that this law promotes competition in domestic oil market. Besides that, this law also states the establishment of Badan Pelaksana Hulu Migas (BP Migas) and Badan Pengatur Hilir Migas (BPH Migas). BP Migas has authority to make oil and gas exploration contract and has being tasked to supervise the implementation of the contract. BPH Migas has responsibility in downstream market regarding to managing the distribution of the fuel and ensuring the availability of the fuel in any region of Indonesia.
To days, we can see the effect of competition in domestic oil industry. Particularly in fuel retail industry, now there are several foreign companies that involve in. As an effect, many SPBU, which previously did not consider about the service, become compete each other to satisfy the consumer. Now, we can see that all SPBU very considers about the quality of oil and measuring instrument. They are also giving additional facilities to increase the loyalty of customers. In many SPBU, we can find healthy and clean toilet, more representative praying place, various way of payment to buy a fuel, even cozy café and mini market is there. Moreover, they very considers about promoting its product. Some SPBU frequently sets new program to attract consumers. Finally, the customer will enjoy more benefits from these changes. It, of course, will increase the consumer welfare in general.
Considering about the changes, Pertamina has also made an improvement. The company set a program that known as Pertamina Way to response the rise of competition in oil industry. The program is focused on giving satisfaction services to the customer. The concept of Pertamina Way includes; (1) motivated and trained staff, (2) quality and quantity guaranteeing, (3) product knowledge, (4) standardized SPBU and (5) maintained equipment including fuel measurement instrument. Besides that, the improvement has also being done in upstream part. Now Pertamina does not only focus on domestic exploration. The company expands its market by involved in exploration tender bidding in several countries such as Brunei Darussalam and South Africa. It shows that Pertamina is on the way to be international oil company.
Regarding to the subsidy of fuel in Indonesia, it may be true that subsidy is still happen until now. Even the subsidy has going bigger due to the increasing of oil price, while Indonesia now is net importer of oil. Nevertheless, by omitting external factor, the subsidy paid by government now is lower than previous monopoly period. Today, not all kind of fuel being subsidize by government. The government only subsidizes the fuel that highly related with law or middle income people such as gasoline, law octane premium and diesel duel. This policy has reduced the burden of subsidy in budget and has given opportunity to other sector that also need subsidy to be more developed. Besides that, this policy makes Pertamina cannot rely much to subsidy to be survive in oil industry as happening under previous period. This policy also forces Pertamina to invent new non subsidized product that attract high class consumer to increase their profit.
Based on explanation above, we can conclude that the new regulation of oil industry is not only beneficial for consumer, but also encourage national oil company to be more efficient and innovative.

to be continued